https://blog.brml.org/on-publication-practice/ Patrick van der Smagt's previous blog // now go to argmax.ai Wed, 20 Jul 2016 06:27:38 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.8 https://blog.brml.org/on-publication-practice/#comment-2122 Tue, 07 Jul 2015 21:37:33 +0000 http://blog.brml.org/?p=188#comment-2122 The answer is simple. Already now do we review our “friends” or “foes”. But we can now do that anonymously, take revenge on people whom we don’t like or the converse. In a double-open system, there’s no alternative. See my other post, of July 2015, on a similar issue: the R-Index.

]]> https://blog.brml.org/on-publication-practice/#comment-155 Tue, 02 Sep 2014 20:48:36 +0000 http://blog.brml.org/?p=188#comment-155 *such certain human aspect’s’

]]> https://blog.brml.org/on-publication-practice/#comment-154 Tue, 02 Sep 2014 20:47:02 +0000 http://blog.brml.org/?p=188#comment-154 Interesting thought! But then, would the quality of the publication be compromised? Let’s say reviewers and authors know each other personally, are good friends / arch-rivals. How would we deal with such certain human aspect?

]]>